Written By: Falakdipti Forum Court of Appeal Case Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740 Decided 1903 Rule of Law A party’s duties are discharged where a party’s purpose is frustrated without fault by the occurrence of an event, which the non-occurrence of which was a basic assumption on which the contract was made. INTRODUCTION Krell v Henry [1] is an important case and a necessary judgement for law students and practitioners to understand the Doctrine of Frustration, which comes under section 56 [2] of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 (agreement to do impossible act). It is an English case and one of the group of cases known as the “coronation cases” [3] which emerged from occasions encompassing the crowning ceremony of King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra in 1902. BACKGROUND In this case the plaintiff was Paul Krell and the defendant was C.S. Henry. Bot...